@caepupdates Methods section of the “testing manual” was so light on detail you wouldn’t be able to reproduce the study…and I still don’t know what a

@caepupdates Methods section of the “testing manual” was so light on detail you wouldn’t be able to reproduce the study…and  I still don’t know what a Pearson Correlation of .26 is “considered high” because they were measuring “content validity” means (http://jgregorymcverry.com/7254-2/)