@karenvaites wellbased on a misreading of the national reading report. It never refuted any methods, wasn't an efficacy study, it was a corollary stud
@karenvaites wellbased on a misreading of the national reading report. It never refuted any methods, wasn't an efficacy study, it was a corollary study....and if you read the technical reports and footnotes the authors note how much research is left out



