Draft Framework for Effective Teaching and Higher Ed
Published by J. Gregory McVerry on
A draft framework to coach college teachers and professors through effective feedback.
1
|
Ineffective | Developing | Effective | Highly Effective | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2
|
Planning | ||||
3
|
Designs lessons with meaningful goals and measurable outcomes | Design choices and connections to goals appear haphazard or not clearly communicated to students. | Design choices appear aligned to standards and measurable, though are inconsistent in their clarity. | Design choices appear aligned to standards, measurable, and presented with clarity to students. | Design choices and connections to standards and outcomes are discussed with students |
4
|
Cooperates with department faculty in planning and aligns class with department or institutional goals | Does not utilize feedback from the Department | Does not seek our department advice or coplanning opportunities but willing to adjust design based on feedback | Collaborative Design choices appear to reflect institutional standards for content, instructional practice, and assessment. | Design choices directly address institutional standards for content, instructional approaches and assessment. |
5
|
Utlizes research or subject matter experts in the design and development of course goals, objectives, and outcomes | Does not utlize research and sources provided in syllabus or does not include research in self designed syllabus | Uses the research and subject matter experts included in a provided rubric | Enhances the class and provided research and subject matter with relevant material | Encourages students to supplement the provided material and research with self selected credible sources |
6
|
Establishes and explains clear expectations in class syllabus | Class expectations not included or listed expectations not followed | Class expectations included but not followed or assessed | Syllabus list the expecations for class and a description of how expectations are assessed | Routines built in the syllabus include ongoign self reflection on how class expectations are met |
7
|
Course design provides a logical progression of content and skills while scaffolding student learning | Syllabus lacks a schedule | A class schedule is provided listing topics | A class schedule connecting objectives to assessment is included and followed that progresses students towards course goals | A class schedule connecting objectives to assessment is followed and allows students to reflect on their progresses towards course goals |
8
|
Incorporates design principles to increase accessibility and accommodate individual learning differences | Class syllabus or learning materials are hard to navigate, lack flexibility, and do not present content coherently | Class syllabus or learning materials present content coherently but may not follow accessibility standards. | Class syllabus or learning materials reflect design choices that account for all learners and provide multiple pathways for demonstrating knowledge growth | Class syllabus or learning materials reflect design choices that account for all learners, present content through multiple represenations across modes while providing multiple pathways for demonstrating knowledge growth |
9
|
|||||
10
|
Classroom Climate | ||||
11
|
Has clear expectations for student behaivor | Students are often off-task or clear expectations of behaivor are not evident | There are expected behaivors listed in the syllabi and infreqnuent instances of off task behaivor leading to the loss of instructional time | Instructor supports students in meeting academic and behavioral expectations of the acadmey. | Instructor build in opportunities for students to refect on their growth in meeting academic and behavioral expectations of the acadmey. |
12
|
Respects student diversity | Establishes a learning environment that disregards students’ cultural, social and/or developmental differences and/or does not address disrespectful behavior. | Establishes a learning environment that is inconsistently respectful of students’ cultural, social and/or developmental differences | Creates a learning environment that utlizes students’ cultural, social and/or developmental differences to improve learing tasks | Learning activities encourage students to use their cultural, social and developmental diversity to improve the course to adress inequity in the world |
13
|
Creates an environment of respect and rapport for all students | The instructor does not promote positive social interactions among students | Creates an environment where students are encouraged to engage in discourse through positive social interaction | Fosters an environment where students proactively demonstrate positive social interactions | Fosters an environment where students proactively demonstrate positive social interactions to effect real world change |
14
|
Instruction | ||||
15
|
Communicates learning outcomes and criteria for success | Does not communitcate critera to students | Includes observable and measurable criteria in the syllabi | Communicates observable and measurable criteria for student success and relates back to class goals. | Creates tasks and routines that encoruage for students to be involved in developing or interpreting criteria for student success. |
16
|
Uses instructional strategies that engage students in constructing new knowledge | Instructor relies soley on basic activities and rote memorization as tools for knowledge growth . | Instructor sometimes engages students in activities that require complex skills that could lead to knowledge gains | Teacher creates learning experiences that allow for multiple perspectives and correct responses and enable students to acquire complex knowledge and skills. | Learning experiences lead to interactions between the students and the instructor that focus on content while offering opprtunities for high quality feedback and refelctive growth |
17
|
Balances content delivery and active student learning | Instructor relies primarily on direct instruction and rarely uses oany collaborative learning activities that have students activeley enage with content. | Instructor relies primarily on direct instruction and sometimes uses collaborative learning activities that have students activeley enage with content. | Instructor balances direct instruction, reflective practices and productive peer interactions by matching modality of delivery to objective | Mixes in direct instruction, reflective practices and productive peer interactions that reflect practices of domain experts. |
18
|
Uses questioning and discussion techniques to enhance student learning | Teacher uses instructional techniques that do not allow most students to actively participate in discussions. |
Teachers uses a mimimal number of questions and question techniques usually focused on single affirmative responses from students | Teacher uses questions and delivers feedback connected to the stated learnign gaols while also involving students in the conversation | Students routinely ask questions and make comments that reveal deep engagement with content. |
19
|
Enhances instruction and extends learning opportunities with effective use of technology | No evidence of effective technology use | Use of technology enhances learning goals | Use of technology enhances learning goals while creating assets and learning spaces available for students at all times | Technology is used to enhance instruction through feedback delivery, additional scaffolds to learners, or tools that enhance engagement |
20
|
Confirms content with relevant subject matter experts, research, or faculty peers. | Makes multiple content errors while teaching that remain unaddressed. | Makes no content errors while teaching | Instructor makes explicit connections to research or subjetc matter experts while inviting students to explain the content to their classmates | Encourages students to question the content accuracy of peers, texts, and the instructor providing clear explanations that extend student thinking. |
21
|
Assessment | ||||
22
|
Provides timely and constructive feedback | Feedback is untimely, missing, or unrelated to stated learning goals | Feedback is timely actionable and driven by the learning goals of the lesson | Students recieve a variety of feedback that is timely actionable and driven by the learning goals of the lesson from a variety of sources. | Instructors involve students in the delivery of feedback from a variety of sources.that is timely actionable and driven by the learning goals of the lesson |
23
|
Monitors and adjusts instruction based on student performance | No evidence of adjusting instruction based on student performance | Adds additiional instructional material based on student performace | There is evidence of adjusting the class schedule, tasks, or course outcomes based on student performance data | Routines for course revision based on learner feedback are included in the syllabus |
24
|
Utilizes forms of assessment that are appropriate to content, learning goals, and outcomes | Uses limited assessment data that may not be connected to the stated learnig goals. | Uses a variety of assessments strategies that elicit evidence of kowledge growth towards the stated objectives | Uses a variety or assessment strategies that promotes student self assessment and progress monitoring | Promotes student self and peer assessment that leads to specific and actionabale feedback around writing goals. |
25
|
|||||
26
|
|||||
27
|
Please note this framework will be given a CC-BY-SA |