@_KaylaDickinson will look tonight
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@_KaylaDickinson will look tonight
Greg McVerryGreg McVerry / Writing & conversations
Replies
Browse the things I’ve written, shared and replied to.
Browse by date
All dates| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 211 | 38 | 47 | 52 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 1019 | 117 | 123 | 133 | 146 |
| 157 | 161 | 175 | 1812 | 192 | 201 | 21 |
| 224 | 2355 | 24 | 256 | 26 | 27 | 281 |
| 29 |
February 2016
167 posts
@hannahkane @flukeout i think issue already exists in teach repo. It was the hackingmymedia page.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@hannahkane @flukeout i think issue already exists in teach repo. It was the hackingmymedia page.
Greg McVerry@mothersele but you are asking them not to eat. Sometimes good people take the soup.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@mothersele but you are asking them not to eat. Sometimes good people take the soup.
Greg McVerry@hannahkane @flukeout Thx, went well, when I do PD tchrs were confused by the old web maker pages saying it was deactivated
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@hannahkane @flukeout Thx, went well, when I do PD tchrs were confused by the old web maker pages saying it was deactivated
Greg McVerry@mothersele Don't blame the developers that is adtech and analytics. Developers doing what they are told for SEO and page views
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@mothersele Don't blame the developers that is adtech and analytics. Developers doing what they are told for SEO and page views
Greg McVerry@jonbecker Yes it will. I am keynoting the one you go to. @daniellynds @sundilu #NotTrue #justsayin
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@jonbecker Yes it will. I am keynoting the one you go to. @daniellynds @sundilu #NotTrue #justsayin
Greg McVerry@eylanezekiel @BuistBunch Thanks for sharing my article about @GitHub and #GAFE teachers.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@eylanezekiel @BuistBunch Thanks for sharing my article about @GitHub and #GAFE teachers.
Greg McVerry@JennBinis They should not have had the contract/"grant." The results are immediately suspect to people who know history.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@JennBinis They should not have had the contract/"grant." The results are immediately suspect to people who know history.
Greg McVerry@JennBinis Respect the item validators as well but a perceived bias is just as damaging to research as actual bias. Be upfront w/ conflict.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@JennBinis Respect the item validators as well but a perceived bias is just as damaging to research as actual bias. Be upfront w/ conflict.
Greg McVerry@jgmac1106 @JennBinis And maybe some will say that is okay. That false objectivity is archaic and think tanks with advocacy research is fine
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@jgmac1106 @JennBinis And maybe some will say that is okay. That false objectivity is archaic and think tanks with advocacy research is fine
Greg McVerry@JennBinis Kudos on rolling with the metaphor. Publishers not labor are the ultimate arbitrators. It is hard to believe bias isn't built in.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@JennBinis Kudos on rolling with the metaphor. Publishers not labor are the ultimate arbitrators. It is hard to believe bias isn't built in.
Greg McVerry@davidekirkland No! Lets act on this!! Now. For many, usually the most impoverished of the world, it is already too late.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@davidekirkland No! Lets act on this!! Now. For many, usually the most impoverished of the world, it is already too late.
Greg McVerry@TheRealPomax Its not so much a class but working with exemplar texts and mentors like you. Workshop your Readme.md file would be class.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@TheRealPomax Its not so much a class but working with exemplar texts and mentors like you. Workshop your Readme.md file would be class.
Greg McVerry@TheRealPomax you define key terms well, organization is logical. Its information rich without reading like documentation. Its good writing
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@TheRealPomax you define key terms well, organization is logical. Its information rich without reading like documentation. Its good writing
Greg McVerry@JennBinis Then lets let meat industry lobbyist handle oversight of the meat inspectors. No conflict there either. Fordham=CCSS lobbyist
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@JennBinis Then lets let meat industry lobbyist handle oversight of the meat inspectors. No conflict there either. Fordham=CCSS lobbyist
Greg McVerry@JennBinis No. Saying publisher who received grant to do the study also has grants to promote the standards and tesst. #ConflictOfInterest
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@JennBinis No. Saying publisher who received grant to do the study also has grants to promote the standards and tesst. #ConflictOfInterest
Greg McVerry@JennBinis @AssessWell And that is exactly my point. We can't rely on Fordham to be that "critical eye" Look past workers find purse strings
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@JennBinis @AssessWell And that is exactly my point. We can't rely on Fordham to be that "critical eye" Look past workers find purse strings
Greg McVerry@JennBinis @AssessWell Just saying an organization paid to advocate for standards and test should not be organization evaluating tests.
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@JennBinis @AssessWell Just saying an organization paid to advocate for standards and test should not be organization evaluating tests.
Greg McVerry@AssessWell @JennBinis #whatsgood #QualityAssessments Fordham received millions from Gates Foundation to promote #ccss judging tests=biad
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@AssessWell @JennBinis #whatsgood #QualityAssessments Fordham received millions from Gates Foundation to promote #ccss judging tests=biad
Greg McVerry@JennBinis @AssessWell in your heart of hearts do you think Fordham would have published study that said SBAC and PARCC are bad tests?
In reply to twitter.com ↗
@JennBinis @AssessWell in your heart of hearts do you think Fordham would have published study that said SBAC and PARCC are bad tests?
Greg McVerry