Post archive

@JennBinis They should not have had the contract/"grant." The results are immediately suspect to people who know history.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis They should not have had the contract/"grant." The results are immediately suspect to people who know history.

@JennBinis Respect the item validators as well but a perceived bias is just as damaging to research as actual bias. Be upfront w/ conflict.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis Respect the item validators as well but a perceived bias is just as damaging to research as actual bias. Be upfront w/ conflict.

@jgmac1106 @JennBinis And maybe some will say that is okay. That false objectivity is archaic and think tanks with advocacy research is fine

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@jgmac1106 @JennBinis And maybe some will say that is okay. That false objectivity is archaic and think tanks with advocacy research is fine

@JennBinis Kudos on rolling with the metaphor. Publishers not labor are the ultimate arbitrators. It is hard to believe bias isn't built in.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis Kudos on rolling with the metaphor. Publishers not labor are the ultimate arbitrators. It is hard to believe bias isn't built in.

@davidekirkland No! Lets act on this!! Now. For many, usually the most impoverished of the world, it is already too late.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@davidekirkland No! Lets act on this!! Now. For many, usually the most impoverished of the world, it is already too late.

@TheRealPomax Its not so much a class but working with exemplar texts and mentors like you. Workshop your Readme.md file would be class.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@TheRealPomax Its not so much a class but working with exemplar texts and mentors like you. Workshop your Readme.md file would be class.

@TheRealPomax you define key terms well, organization is logical. Its information rich without reading like documentation. Its good writing

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@TheRealPomax you define key terms well, organization is logical. Its information rich without reading like documentation. Its good writing

@JennBinis Then lets let meat industry lobbyist handle oversight of the meat inspectors. No conflict there either. Fordham=CCSS lobbyist

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis Then lets let meat industry lobbyist handle oversight of the meat inspectors. No conflict there either. Fordham=CCSS lobbyist

@JennBinis No. Saying publisher who received grant to do the study also has grants to promote the standards and tesst. #ConflictOfInterest

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis No. Saying publisher who received grant to do the study also has grants to promote the standards and tesst. #ConflictOfInterest

@JennBinis @AssessWell And that is exactly my point. We can't rely on Fordham to be that "critical eye" Look past workers find purse strings

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis @AssessWell And that is exactly my point. We can't rely on Fordham to be that "critical eye" Look past workers find purse strings

@TheRealPomax Should teach a class on how to write read.md files on @github. Useful for non-tech folks like me. Learning not documentation

@TheRealPomax Should teach a class on how to write read.md files on @github. Useful for non-tech folks like me. Learning not documentation

How the @GitHub Update Could Be a Game Changer For #GAFE Teachers

GitHub made a recent update to their web interface that now makes me believe it is a place every educator belongs. flickr photo shared by Bernie Goldbach under a Creative Commons ( BY-NC-ND ) license You can now create and drag and drop files into your repos. Think of a repo as a cabinet,that holds both files and folders. Attached to your "cabinet" is a clip

@JennBinis @AssessWell Just saying an organization paid to advocate for standards and test should not be organization evaluating tests.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis @AssessWell Just saying an organization paid to advocate for standards and test should not be organization evaluating tests.

@AssessWell @JennBinis #whatsgood #QualityAssessments Fordham received millions from Gates Foundation to promote #ccss judging tests=biad

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@AssessWell @JennBinis #whatsgood #QualityAssessments Fordham received millions from Gates Foundation to promote #ccss judging tests=biad

@JennBinis @AssessWell in your heart of hearts do you think Fordham would have published study that said SBAC and PARCC are bad tests?

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis @AssessWell in your heart of hearts do you think Fordham would have published study that said SBAC and PARCC are bad tests?

@JennBinis @AssessWell I would have settled for peer review

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis @AssessWell I would have settled for peer review

@JennBinis oops yes, my bad.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis oops yes, my bad.

@jennbinis as a side note your ten year reflection of Klein was well written. I enjoyed it.

@jennbinis as a side note your ten year reflection of Klein was well written. I enjoyed it.

@jgmac1106 @JennBinis @AssessWell I am just saying study should have been done by someone with less skin in the game. Not attacking methods

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@jgmac1106 @JennBinis @AssessWell I am just saying study should have been done by someone with less skin in the game. Not attacking methods

@JennBinis @AssessWell because of lobbying efforts from places such as Ed Excellence. They should not be the judge of quality

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JennBinis @AssessWell because of lobbying efforts from places such as Ed Excellence. They should not be the judge of quality