Post archive

@OtisTheGoodGoat Agree.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@OtisTheGoodGoat Agree.

@OtisTheGoodGoat We don't know much about the motives yet. Statistically I lean more towards someone mad at Kirk for not being far-right enough, and t

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@OtisTheGoodGoat We don't know much about the motives yet. Statistically I lean more towards someone mad at Kirk for not being far-right enough, and the bullet markings do trend Groyper. Either way nobody should ever condone political violence. There we all agree. That's a defensible line.

@JonnyRoqqet You do see "loss of confidence" quite often when someone loses a command without much explanation. That is true.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@JonnyRoqqet You do see "loss of confidence" quite often when someone loses a command without much explanation. That is true.

Political Violence is always wrong. Online Radicalization in neonazi, Groyper and Nihilistic communities that push "Saints Culture" is a national secu

Political Violence is always wrong. Online Radicalization in neonazi, Groyper and Nihilistic communities that push "Saints Culture" is a national security threat. Political extremism and violence is almost always far-right. All of those are true. The first point matters most

@RealPData Saying political violence is always wrong?

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@RealPData Saying political violence is always wrong?

@AmericanPurrl @LoveMeSomeTX I didn't say it was new. I just can't recall a time when every single Secretary came out on social media to explain a pol

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@AmericanPurrl @LoveMeSomeTX I didn't say it was new. I just can't recall a time when every single Secretary came out on social media to explain a policy around speech and the criticism of a civilian. Seems out of the norm. Thanks for helping me understand.

@OtisTheGoodGoat I agree, but what makes the line of criticism of Charlie Kirk as a person or his role in January 6th and mocking? I just can't think

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@OtisTheGoodGoat I agree, but what makes the line of criticism of Charlie Kirk as a person or his role in January 6th and mocking? I just can't think of another example. Why just this political assassination?

@coocoocthulu That's a good explanation.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@coocoocthulu That's a good explanation.

@Sarcasm_Sells Did they publicly say they would go after anyone who criticized the Minnesota politicians? I am looking for prior examples of en masse

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@Sarcasm_Sells Did they publicly say they would go after anyone who criticized the Minnesota politicians? I am looking for prior examples of en masse discipline for criticizing a civilian murder victim.

@TreyK4570 Yes. This I figured. Just wondering why this time and not for any other civilian murder. What makes this case different?

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@TreyK4570 Yes. This I figured. Just wondering why this time and not for any other civilian murder. What makes this case different?

@ingovernable1 I never said you couldn't limit speech. I asked for examples of en masse punishments for criticizing a civilian. Why just this civilian

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@ingovernable1 I never said you couldn't limit speech. I asked for examples of en masse punishments for criticizing a civilian. Why just this civilian? Why not after the Minnesota murders? Those were politicians. Don't forget all the JAGs fired, and ton of lawyers on loan to ICE.

Must have been studying critical theory electricity. https://t.co/FFXvIrTX1R

In reply to twitter.com ↗

Must have been studying critical theory electricity. https://t.co/FFXvIrTX1R

@ingovernable1 Protecting assets is not the same as en masse punishment for criticizing a civilian, don't be daft.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@ingovernable1 Protecting assets is not the same as en masse punishment for criticizing a civilian, don't be daft.

@coocoocthulu @LoveMeSomeTX Funny thing the guy who went after Bill Clinton for Monica Lewinsky is also the guy who let Jeffrey Epstein get away.

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@coocoocthulu @LoveMeSomeTX Funny thing the guy who went after Bill Clinton for Monica Lewinsky is also the guy who let Jeffrey Epstein get away.

@Dai10zin What is the difference between "mock" and criticize someone. Just using the language of the OGP

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@Dai10zin What is the difference between "mock" and criticize someone. Just using the language of the OGP

@Faakew2 But how many times have those policies been enforced en masse for criticizing a civilian? Since you have more knowledge surely you are a bett

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@Faakew2 But how many times have those policies been enforced en masse for criticizing a civilian? Since you have more knowledge surely you are a better source than me on examples?

@gillman_ja48237 @LoveMeSomeTX Was it for not following orders or talking about Covid? I don't know the data on how many separations their were over C

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@gillman_ja48237 @LoveMeSomeTX Was it for not following orders or talking about Covid? I don't know the data on how many separations their were over Covid.and how many were over talking about Covid and how many were about not sticking to the vaccine schedule.

The party THAT voted to protect the Epstein Files, also voted to get more of Trump's team in place in bulk confirmation. Think on that. Why would they

The party THAT voted to protect the Epstein Files, also voted to get more of Trump's team in place in bulk confirmation. Think on that. Why would they do that? What is Thune trying to hide? https://x.com/LeaderJohnThune/status/1966250575621963940

@LoveMeSomeTX I understand the claim and how the UCMJ can be used, but tell me when has this happened so publicly in the past when large groups of Ser

In reply to twitter.com ↗

@LoveMeSomeTX I understand the claim and how the UCMJ can be used, but tell me when has this happened so publicly in the past when large groups of Service members are said to face discipline for comments about a civilian?

And this is what Kirk did with Professor Watchlist. They would be published and look all official like But a seedy underbelly of far-right trolls star

And this is what Kirk did with Professor Watchlist. They would be published and look all official like But a seedy underbelly of far-right trolls starts harassment campaigns. This is the same playbook. https://x.com/RepAdamMorgan/status/1966621193617674509